Isinampa ni Annabelle Rama sa Makati Regional Trial Court kahapon, Feb 23, ang 20-million defame box laban sa kanyang talent na si Alynna Alexandra Asistio—na kilala sa showbiz bilang Ynna Asistio.
Bukod kay Ynna, kinasuhan hubbub ni Annabelle ng defame ang Bulgar party editor na si Janice Navida dahil ito ang sumulat ng artikulong lumabas sa nabanggit na announcement noong Feb 1, 2012.
Kasama ni Annabelle na nagpunta sa Makati Regional Trial Court ang kanyang mga talent na sina Bubbles Paraiso during Michelle Madrigal.
Ginawang witnesses ni Annabelle ang dalawang voluptuous stars na magpapatunay tender na walang katotohanan ang akusasyon na “ibinubugaw” ng talent manager ang mga alaga nito.
Sa kanyang eight-page sworn complaint-affidavit, isinalaysay ni Annabelle ang puno’t dulo ng desisyon niyang sampahan ng defame box sina Asistio during Navida.
Narito ang kabuuang complaint-affidavit ni Annabelle:
“I am an artist and talent manager by contention who manages a business concerns and careers of several party artists, and partial of my duties and functions is to hoop any and all negotiations and contracts between my clients and producers or companies who wish to rivet their services.
“As an artist and talent manager, my actions have always been underneath a unpleasant inspection of a open and subjected to a cultured eyes of my critics.
“This reality, however, never daunted nor dissuaded me from stability to live a life in a use for others for we have vowed to approach all my efforts and actions to assistance urge a careers of any and of my talents, a formidable feat, though positively not out of reach.
“As an artist and talent manager, my repute is of pinnacle significance to me. Certainly, no artist would even dream of being managed by a chairman famous for her controversial impression and integrity. It is for this reason that we have always been advantageous with my actions and even if there were certain instances when a open would somehow debate of my actions, we still trust that it was really called for and within a end of law specifically to strengthen a seductiveness of my talents.
LIBELOUS STATEMENTS. “On 01 Feb 2012, while during my chateau during 2170 Paraiso Street, Dasmariñas Village, Makati City, we was repelled and perturbed to review an essay in BULGAR, a journal of ubiquitous circulation, to that respondents caused a announcement of derogatory statements opposite me.
“The foregoing matter severely expel doubt on my honor, firmness and repute thereby sincerely inspiring my station as an artist and talent manager.
“Moreover, a derogatory statements had also influenced my family and talents for it has caused disrepute and disprove on my chairman and a talents who are compared with me.
THE CONSPIRACY. “On 01 Feb 2012, Ms. Asistio in swindling with Ms. Navida, caused a announcement of a derogatory news essay in BULGAR.
“In a pronounced news essay Ms. Navida wrote:
Tinanong namin si Ynna tungkol sa isyung ‘bugawan‘ na inaakusa ng mommy niya kay Tita A. Nadamay hubbub kasi ru’n ang pangalan ni Cong. Manny Pacquiao dahil inirereto tender ni Tita Annabelle sa Pambansang Kamao si Alyanna na 16 years aged lang pala.
Ano crash basehan nila para sabihing ‘ibinubugaw’ ni Tita A. ang mga alaga niya, generally silang magkakapatid?
Sey ni Ynna, “Minsan po kasi, isinama siya sa bahay nina Cong. Manny during Gov. Chavit (Singson),” na hindi naman niya dinagdagan ng ibang detalye.
Basta sabi ni Ynna, ang propensity tender ni Tita A. ay maikli ang isinusuot nila ‘pag humaharap sa mga tao sa special occasions tulad nu’ng minsang birthday ni Cong. Pacquiao.
Eh, siya, ganu’n hubbub ba ang sinasabi sa kanya ni Tita A.?
May mga personal knowledge rin po ako pero ‘di na ako magsasalita,” sagot ni Ynna.
May isang insidente naman daw sa Cebu na isinama silang magkakapatid ni Tita A. during ipinakilala sa mga “may-edad” nang bisita nito sabay sabing “Single ang mga ‘yan.”
From afterwards on, umiwas na tender sila during hindi na sumama uli sa mga lakad ng manager dahil feeling nga tender nila ay ‘ibinebenta’ sila nito.
TARNISHED REPUTATION. “As a outcome of a announcement of a baseless, derogatory and antagonistic indictment of Respondents that we was soliciting for harlotry respondent Asistio’s sisters, we was bombarded by my talents, reporters and friends seeking me to criticism on her ungrounded allegation.
“However, it is also estimable to stress that from a resources surrounding this benefaction case, satisfactory deduction can be done that a sure matter directly accusing me of enchanting in soliciting for harlotry my talents, thereby evidently implying that we am intent in an bootleg activity.
Get showbiz news anytime, anywhere on your mobile! Just pivotal in PEP ON and send to 4627. Available to all Sun, Globe, and Smart subscribers.